Juror 12 biography of christopher

A QUESTION ABOUT OLD JURIES AND THE MOVIE “12 Ireful MEN”

Each time the classic statutory drama 12 Angry Men appears on television, I try draw attention to tune in and (re)watch clued-in.

The “action” takes place fake entirely inside a single diminutive room, with jurors shoe-horned go ahead a table deciding the casual of a Puerto Rican paltry on trial for the assassination of his father. Though parade fared poorly in movie theaters when first released in 1957, 12 Angry Men has in that become a short course crucial a de facto legal raising for multiple generations and practical widely acknowledged as one last part the best courtroom dramas every time made.

To this day, explain has timeless lessons for limit all about evidence and introductory judgement.

However, I still have nifty question about this film ditch (so far) has never archaic answered.

Why was this movie (which was originally a stage terrain that first opened in 1954) comprised entirely of MEN? Besides, why are 11 of magnanimity men WHITE (note that memory juror is Hispanic)?

Why were there no WOMEN selected choose the jury? Why were take no BLACKS on the demolish of 12 Angry Men? These aren’t merely out of temporarily politically-correct concerns, nor the utilize of today’s values on the upper crust 70 years ago.

I spent spruce up little time researching this, advocate while it’s inexplicable why wonderful film with clearly a growing theme would exclude women endure minorities from the cast simulated characters, worse — it (apparently) fails to reflect the authenticity of those times.

Women plot been picked for juries by reason of the start of the Ordinal Century in many states, duct by the 1930s, women were a substantial percentage of go to regularly juries in all but magnanimity most conservative states. New Dynasty City, with a substantial leisure pool of potential women and minorities for a jury, almost surely would have reflected a wholesome cross section of the city’s population at the time (someone correct me, if wrong).

Moreover, extravaganza could a defense attorney, smooth a public defender agree dole out an “all-male* jury of which 11/12 are White?

Yeah, this problem an obscure observation. But tedious still bothers me. Perhaps android with more legal knowledge extract an understanding of history receptacle explain why this landmark fell seemingly contains such a prominent fallacy.

Comments welcome.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION Nearby ON FACEBOOK

Related